THE SATELLITE
LELP-1: design of a free-flying life-science lab
LELP-1 is a free-flying, uncrewed laboratory for life science and microgravity research. It flies 32 sealed experiment bays in a 550 km dawn-dusk orbit for as long as the longest experiment on board needs, up to 14 days, runs them automatically on signed customer commands, and brings the whole lab home under an inflatable heat shield so samples reach the customer's courier within half an hour of splashdown.
Mission
LELP-1 is the orbital laboratory of the RUPAK system. The reusable RUPAK booster and its upper stage put the lab into a 550 km dawn-dusk sun-synchronous orbit. The upper stage stays attached during the mission: it carries the solar wings, trims the orbit and later flies the deorbit burn. Lab operations last as long as the longest protocol on the manifest (2 to 14 days). Then the robotic arm parks itself on the stage, the lab separates, inflates its 2.6 m heat shield, enters, opens its parachute at 4 km and splashes down near the recovery ship. The arm, the solar wings and the relay antenna stay with the stage, so 222.6 kg comes home and the stage breaks up over open sea.
LELP-1 in CAD
Generated from the twin by cad/build_lelp1.py (CadQuery, OpenCascade): the 32-bay stack with each bay's payload mass, the central chamber, the packed heat shield, Dexter-L on its ring track, and the RUPAK upper stage with the 600 W wings, the relay boom and the arm's grapple post (the stage is simplified context). Switch to Entry for the Return Module with its 2.6 m heat shield inflated.
CAD generated by cad/build_cad.py (CadQuery, OpenCascade kernel) from the sizing numbers: concept geometry, not a released design.
Mass properties from the solids
| Configuration | Mass kg | CoM z, m | Principal inertia, kg m² | Twin's estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In orbit: lab on the RUPAK upper stage | 970 | -1.34 | 1996 / 2019 / 191 | 420 / 420 / 110 |
| Return Module, heat shield inflated | 222.6 | +0.65 | 65 / 68 / 44 | - |
Finding. The inertia computed from the CAD is about 4.8 times the twin's earlier estimate about the transverse axes, because the upper stage's mass sits metres from the stack's centre of mass. The twin now uses the CAD values; whole-mission runs of the attitude model:
| Case | Peak wheel momentum | Margin at peak | Pointing error, arm moving | Peak disturbance | Dumping, share of time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| twin estimate (before 4 Oct 2026) | 91.3 % | 9.5 % | 7.2° | 154 µN m | 4.9 % |
| CAD, 3 x 3.5 N m s wheels | 86.5 % | 15.6 % | 4.2° | 712 µN m | 7.6 % |
| CAD, 3 x 4.0 N m s wheels | 74.0 % | 35.1 % | 4.2° | 712 µN m | 5.4 % |
Gravity-gradient torque grows about five-fold and the magnetorquers dump more often, but Dexter-L's momentum still sizes the wheels. With 3 x 3.5 N m s wheels the margin at the peak is about 16 %, under a 25 % design target; 4.0 N m s wheels give about 35 %, at a wheel mass the vendor has to give. The larger inertia also cuts the pointing error while the arm moves from about 7° to about 4°.
What the 15 reference experiments ask, and how LELP-1 answers
The catalog's experiments are the design drivers. "Standard" is in every bay; "option" is a bay variant a customer books; "new" is a capability this design adds to LELP-1 because the experiments need it.
The experiment bay
| Medium bay | Large bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Payload mass | 3.3 kg | 6.0 kg |
| Peak power | 15 W | 30 W |
| Culture cassette | 12 wells | 24 wells |
| Temperature | 25 W thermoelectric block, any setpoint from 4 to 45 °C, held through re-entry | |
| Services | automated fluidics (pumps, valves, reservoirs for media, drugs, fixative and lysis buffer, waste bag); an optional LumaScope-class inverted microscope (brightfield and two fluorescence channels); active silicon dosimeter and passive TLDs; temperature, pressure, humidity and acceleration sensors; a passive -80 °C cassette for cryopreserved launch, loaded 24 h before launch; transfer by the robotic arm to the central lab's 40x fluorescence microscope. | |
| Containment | BSL-2 triple containment, pressure and seal monitoring, isolation on a leak | |
| Control | your own signed commands (start, preserve, arm tasks), checked by Sentinel; operator can power or isolate a bay but not run your protocol | |
Environment in the bays
Microgravity, quasi-steady
| Source | Level | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Atmospheric drag | 6.0 × 10⁻⁹ g | density 3e-13 kg/m³ (moderate solar activity), 3 m² side area, Cd 2.2, 962 kg lab and upper stage |
| Gravity gradient | 7.3 × 10⁻⁷ g | 3n²d for a bay 2 m from the stack's centre of mass (estimate), along the local vertical |
| Rotation with the orbit | 2.4 × 10⁻⁷ g | n²d, only if the stack turns once per orbit to stay Earth-pointing |
Quasi-steady accelerations at a bay are below one millionth of Earth's gravity in the twin's numbers and are set by the gravity gradient, because the bays sit about 2 m from the centre of mass of the lab and upper-stage stack; drag at 550 km is about a hundred times smaller. That is the same order as the ISS's quasi-steady level, so a free-flyer's real gain is in vibration and transients: no crew, no dockings, no station machinery. LELP-1 has its own disturbances: in the twin the robotic arm shakes the lab to about 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻³ g while it moves (estimate), and reaction wheels and pumps add vibration. The mission plan therefore keeps quiet windows (no arm moves during crystallisation, solidification or mechanobiology steps), and every bay logs its own acceleration so customers see what their samples felt. These LELP-1 levels are model estimates until a bay accelerometer flies.
Radiation
The twin's dosimeter model gives about 0.6 mGy per day inside a bay at 550 km, with about six South Atlantic Anomaly passes a day, so a 7-day flight collects a few mGy. Measured doses inside the ISS Columbus module were about 0.2 to 0.36 mGy per day (table below), so the model is 1.7 to 3 times higher: plausible for a higher orbit with less shielding, but a model value until the dosimeter flies. Every bay logs its own dose from lab power-on to entry, and passive TLDs integrate the whole flight. A few mGy is far below the doses of most in-vitro radiation studies, so on LELP-1 microgravity dominates the space-versus-ground difference; a 1 g centrifuge bay on board separates the two.
The environment compared with earlier platforms
| What | Value |
|---|---|
| ISS quasi-steady acceleration (below 0.01 Hz) | On the order of less than 1 micro-g; mainly from aerodynamic drag and vehicle rotation14 |
| ISS vibratory acceleration without isolation | Spectrum runs from much less than 1 micro-g below 0.1 Hz to well over 10 milli-g at high frequency; payload isolation can cut it by up to a factor of 10014 |
| ISS absorbed dose rate inside Columbus (DOSIS 2009-2011, DOSIS 3D from 2012) | 195-270 microGy per day (2010 minimum) to 260-360 microGy per day (2012 maximum), i.e. about 0.2-0.36 mGy per day; varies with solar activity, ISS altitude and shielding15 |
| Comparison with LELP-1 estimate | Our model value of about 0.6 mGy per day at 550 km is about 1.7 to 3 times the ISS Columbus values. Higher is the expected direction (higher altitude, lighter shielding), but no opened source gives a free-flyer number at 550 km. Treat 0.6 mGy per day as our estimate until checked.15 |
| Free-flyer radiation measured on a biosatellite | Bion-M No.1 carried an RD3-B3 radiometer-dosimeter at 253-585 km in April-May 2013; dose-rate numbers not in the opened record18 |
| Altitude of other recent platforms | POEM-4 at about 350 km; The Exploration Company Mission Possible at 550 km (same altitude as LELP-1)1016 |
| Free-flyer microgravity level | No opened source gave a measured quasi-steady level for Bion-M, Foton-M or SJ-10. The LELP-1 figure (about 1e-6 g near the centre of mass) is our design estimate, not a sourced benchmark. |
Sources
- ISRO, CROPS: A Leap in Space Biological Experiments https://www.isro.gov.in/CROPS.html
- NASA, A Researcher's Guide to: Acceleration Environment (NP-2015-11-040-JSC) https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/acceleration-environment-iss-mini-book_detail-508c.pdf
- Berger T et al., 2016, DOSIS & DOSIS 3D: long-term dose monitoring onboard the Columbus Laboratory of the International Space Station (ISS), Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, doi:10.1051/swsc/2016034 https://elib.dlr.de/107982
- The Exploration Company, 2025, Mission Possible: re-entry milestone achieved for Europe's reusable spaceflight https://exploration.space/blog/mission-possible-re-entry-milestone-achieved-for-europes-reusable-spaceflight
- Dachev TP et al., 2015, BION-M No. 1 spacecraft radiation environment as observed by the RD3-B3 radiometer-dosimeter in April-May 2013, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 123:82-91, doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2014.12.011 https://cris.fau.de/publications/106622384?lang=de_DE
Lessons from earlier platforms
- Get return approvals early (Varda W-1): the capsule launched in June 2023 but its FAA reentry license came only on 14 February 2024, and reporting cites license delays. LELP-1 should hold its reentry, range and splashdown permits before launch so the 2-14 day lab clock is real.
- Drop-test the whole descent chain (The Exploration Company Mission Possible): the capsule reentered under control but was lost after communications cut at 26 km, before parachute opening; the chutes had not been drop-tested. LELP-1 should qualify the inflatable heat shield, parachute and flotation end to end before flying customer samples.
- Plan the splash zone around the ships (ATMOS Phoenix 1): the inflatable heat shield flew, but the capsule splashed about 2,000 km offshore and recovery was not planned. LELP-1 must target a zone where the recovery ship already waits, to keep the 2 h courier handover.
- Hand samples over fast (Bion-M No.1): mice were examined about 3 h after landing and showed some motor recovery by 6-8 h, so timing changed the readout. LELP-1 should log time from splashdown to fixation for every sample and offer in-flight fixation before reentry.
- Monitor every bay so faults can be told apart from biology (Foton-M No.4 and Bion-M No.1): all Foton-M4 geckos died and the cause was still being assessed at landing; on Bion-M No.1, 15 mice died from a food-system failure. LELP-1 should log video, temperature, gas and fluidics state per bay, and consider a 1 g centrifuge control bay.
- Run an identical ground twin (EcAMSat): flight results were compared with an identical payload run in the lab at NASA Ames. LELP-1 should run a synchronous ground bay with the same cassette, media and timeline for every customer.
- Use proven autonomous well and card assays (PharmaSat, EcAMSat, BioSentinel): automated culture with dosing and in-flight readout worked without crew. LELP-1's 12- and 24-well cassettes with automated fluidics follow this path; downlink key data in flight so the mission still yields results if return fails.
- Pair dose with biology (BioSentinel): a TimePix-based spectrometer flew next to the yeast to link dose and response. LELP-1 should keep an active dosimeter and passive TLDs in each bay and report dose per sample.
- Hold temperature through the whole timeline (POEM-4 CROPS, Bion-M No.1): CROPS kept 20-30 C and Bion-M held about 21 C. LELP-1's 4-45 C bay control should stay powered through reentry, float and ship transfer, with a logged temperature trace handed to the customer.
- Decide what must come back (SJ-10): only the return capsule with 11 loads came home while 8 loads kept running on the orbital module. LELP-1 returns the whole 243 kg lab, which simplifies sample handling but costs mass; this is a positioning point, not just a feature.
- Offer data access like a station facility (ICE Cubes): customers log in remotely 24 hours a day and send commands. LELP-1's ground segment should give customers the same live view and signed command path.
- Position against no-return platforms (POEM-4): stage platforms give orbit time at about 350 km but no sample return. LELP-1's value is return of live or fixed samples within days; say so plainly.
From the platform benchmark on the overview; sources there.
Subsystems
Chips show where each number comes from: TEAM a team document, TWIN the twin's own design, EST an engineering estimate, TBD open. Hover for the source.
| Orbit | 550 km TEAM dawn-dusk sun-synchronous, inclination 97.6 deg EST, period 95.6 min |
| Power | solar wings 600 W TWIN at beginning of life, battery 1500 Wh TWIN, 28 V EST bus. The dawn-dusk orbit keeps the arrays in sunlight most of the year; it crosses the Earth's shadow only from 03 May to 09 August, at most 22 min per orbit (23 %). |
| Thermal | lab held near 21 C EST by a 0.85 m2 EST radiator and heaters; each bay's own thermoelectric block sets its culture temperature. Team bands: mammalian 36.5 to 37.5 C TEAM, microbial 22 to 37 C TEAM, plants 20 to 23 C TEAM, cryo -80 to -20 C TEAM |
| Attitude | 3 reaction wheels of 3.5 N m s EST sized for the robotic arm's momentum, star tracker, magnetorquers of 20 A m2 EST for momentum dumping |
| Data | on-board computer ARM Cortex-A, cFS or F Prime TEAM, 256 GB EST storage for imaging archives that come home with the lab |
| Communications | S-band TT&C through ISTRAC at 32,000 bit/s TWIN down; X-band science through Leuk (Switzerland) 2,000,000 bit/s TWIN and ESOC (Germany) 1,500,000 bit/s TWIN; inter-satellite relay 600,000 bit/s TWIN |
| Propulsion | none on the lab: the RUPAK upper stage stays attached, trims the orbit and flies the 150 m/s TWIN deorbit burn (Isp 330 s TEAM) |
| Return | 2.6 m inflatable heat shield (4 tori, packed 1.1 m), 223 kg at entry, peak 7.7 g and 434 kW/m² in the twin's entry model, 9 m main parachute at 4 km, splashdown at 7.9 m/s |
| Command security | Sentinel: every command signed with ML-DSA-87 (post-quantum), checked against ownership and lab rules, and screened by a mission guardian; customers can only command their own bays |
Mass budget
| Item | kg | Return |
|---|---|---|
| experiment modules (32: 6 kg large, 3 kg medium class) | 110.6 | comes home |
| lab structure, entry-rated module latches | 34.0 | comes home |
| central chamber, translation rig, sensors | 10.0 | comes home |
| avionics, radios, Sentinel crypto unit, harness, beacons | 13.0 | comes home |
| battery 1.5 kWh | 10.0 | comes home |
| ADCS: 3 x 3.5 N m s wheels sized for the arm, star tracker, magnetorquers | 11.0 | comes home |
| thermal control | 6.0 | comes home |
| HIAD: 4 tori and straps | 6.0 | comes home |
| HIAD: flexible TPS (ceramic fabric, insulator, gas barrier) | 6.0 | comes home |
| HIAD: rigid nose and centerbody TPS | 6.0 | comes home |
| HIAD: inflation system (2 kg N2, bottle, valves) | 5.0 | comes home |
| main parachute 9 m, mortar, riser | 5.0 | comes home |
| Dexter-L arm and controller (parks on the upper stage) | 12.0 | stays with the upper stage |
| solar wings 600 W (stay on the upper stage) | 7.0 | stays with the upper stage |
| ISL antenna boom (stays on the upper stage) | 1.0 | stays with the upper stage |
| Launch | 242.6 | 7.4 kg margin to 250 kg |
The modules line is the 32 payload sheets in the twin's manifest. 6 kg and 3.3 kg are bay limits, not module masses: a manifest with every bay at its limit would weigh about 281 kg, so every manifest is checked against the 250 kg allocation.
Open design items
- Power for the new bay types (lit bay, centrifuge, furnace, freezer) has to fit the 600 W array with the platform loads; the twin has not yet budgeted them.
- Reaction wheels are sized for the robotic arm (3 x 3.5 N m s); a slower arm would allow smaller wheels and less vibration.
- A manifest with every bay at its limit would weigh about 281 kg, above the 250 kg allocation; every manifest is checked.
- Bay accelerometers and the quiet-window plan need a vibration analysis of the arm, wheels and pumps.
- Entry loads on samples (7.7 g peak in the entry model) and splashdown shock need qualification for each bay type.
- The payload partner for bay hardware (fluidics, imagers) is not decided; the twin assumes Space Philic builds the standard bay.