SPACE PHILICLELP-1 · LIFE SCIENCE IN ORBIT
Experiments · 09 of 15

Microbiology / materials

Biofilm formation on spacecraft and medical materials

Bacteria that settle on a surface build a slime-covered community called a biofilm. On Earth these films clog pipes and filters and cause device-related infections, and they are much harder to kill than free-floating cells. In spacecraft the same films can grow in water lines and life-support hardware; NASA states that biofilm formation can cause equipment malfunction and human illnesses. Microgravity removes sedimentation and buoyancy-driven flow, which changes how cells and oxygen reach a surface. Two flight experiments with the same strain, run with different growth media, reported opposite results, so the question is still open. A free-flyer lets a materials or device maker fly coupons of their own surface, run an identical module on the ground, and get the fixed coupons back for imaging.

BayLarge · 6.0 kg
Power28 W peak
Temperature37 °C
Duration7 days
LaunchesLive inoculum held in stasis in PBS at 4 C…
Returns4 °C · lab within 168 h

Who it is for

  • Life-support (ECLSS) hardware suppliers qualifying water-system materials, tubing and filters
  • Medical device makers testing catheter-grade silicone and other indwelling-device surfaces
  • Antimicrobial and anti-fouling coating companies, including lubricant-impregnated and laser-textured surfaces
  • Antibiotic and anti-biofilm drug developers who want a growth condition that changes biofilm robustness
  • Space agencies and habitat operators writing material-selection and cleaning rules
  • Hospital infection-control and surface-science research groups

What earlier flights found

YearMissionWhat flewWhat it found
Published 2013STS-132 and STS-135 (Space Shuttle Atlantis)Space ShuttlePseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 in BioServe Fluid Processing Apparatus (FPA) units inside Group Activation Packs, housed in a Commercial Generic Bioprocessing Apparatus. Biofilms grew on a 13 mm mixed cellulose ester membrane in modified artificial urine medium with 6 mM sodium nitrate as terminal electron acceptor, static, 37 C for 72 h, then cooled to 8 C and fixed with 9% paraformaldehyde. Some units used solid inserts (no gas exchange), others gas-exchange inserts.Spaceflight increased viable cells about three-fold (p<0.01) and increased biofilm biomass and thickness. Flight biofilms showed a structure of columns overlaid with a canopy, not reported before in static culture on Earth. A flagella-motility mutant did not form that structure. With gas-exchange inserts (more oxygen) no flight-versus-ground difference was seen.1
Launched November 2019 on Cygnus NG-12, returned early 2020 on SpaceX CRS-19; papers 2022 and 2023Space Biofilms (bacterial part), ISSISSP. aeruginosa PA14 in FPAs inside Group Activation Packs, incubated in BioServe's Space Automated Bioproduct Lab. Six materials: stainless steel 316, passivated SS316, a lubricant-impregnated surface, catheter-grade silicone with and without a laser-patterned microtopography, and cellulose membrane. Inoculum held in stasis in PBS (OD595 0.001) at 4 C, activated on orbit by the crew, grown 1, 2 or 3 days at 37 C in LB Lennox with 0.86% potassium nitrate in sealed chambers that force anaerobic growth, then terminated on orbit with 4% paraformaldehyde (morphology) or RNAlater (transcriptomics). Fixed samples were kept at 4 C; preserved samples at -80 C on orbit and returned at -20 C.On stainless steel and on the lubricant-impregnated surface, flight biofilms had significantly lower biomass and thickness than 1 g controls (p<=0.05), the opposite direction to the 2013 shuttle result, under a different medium. The lubricant-impregnated surface strongly reduced biofilm compared with stainless steel, more so in flight than on the ground; the authors propose it prevents the first stage, cell attachment. Passivated and plain SS316 showed no morphological difference.246
Same flight, published 2024Space Biofilms (bacterial part), ISS - silicone and cellulose samplesISSCatheter-grade silicone (1 cm2), silicone with a 3 um line-like laser interference pattern (0.635 cm2) and cellulose membrane (1.4 cm discs), grown 1, 2 and 3 days at 37 C, fixed with paraformaldehyde on orbit and imaged after return.Microgravity did not change the overall 3-D form of the biofilms; form depended on the material and its topography. The column-and-canopy structure was not observed, and the 3 um line pattern did not reduce biofilm on silicone. The authors leave open whether a more robust biofilm would have shown the canopy structure.3

How LELP-1 runs it

Sample. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 (BSL-2 model biofilm organism) plus a customer coupon panel: up to 24 coupons of about 1 cm2, for example stainless steel 316, catheter-grade silicone, a candidate coating and a cellulose membrane reference. Container. 24-well sealed cassette in one large bay. Each well has a glass window on the bottom and holds one coupon above it; three fluid lines serve each well: growth medium, 4% paraformaldehyde, and RNA preservative, plus a shared PBS line for post-fixation washing and staining. Launch. Live inoculum held in stasis in PBS at 4 C (not frozen), diluted to about OD595 0.001; medium, fixative and preservative loaded cold in separate sealed reservoirs; coupons cleaned, sterilised by a method each material tolerates, and mounted in the cassette. Light and gas. No light needed; wells kept dark except during microscope imaging. No CO2 and no gas supply: the cassette is sealed and the medium carries nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor, so growth becomes anaerobic, as in both heritage flights. An aerobic variant with gas-permeable well lids is flown as a separate bay; on the shuttle, more oxygen removed the flight-ground difference.

  1. day 0

    After orbit insertion and attitude settling, the bay ramps from 4 C to 37 C over about 2 h. Pumps fill all 24 wells with medium over the coupons, then inject the stasis inoculum. Static growth starts; first brightfield images and a transmission turbidity reading are taken.

  2. day 1

    Daily automated run: brightfield image stack of each well through the glass window, turbidity reading, and a log of bay temperature, pressure, seal state, dosimeter dose and accelerometer data.

  3. day 2

    Repeat the daily imaging and sensor run. No pumping or arm motion is scheduled, to keep the quasi-steady level near 1e-6 g.

  4. day 3

    Repeat the daily run. Optional single transfer of the bay by the robotic arm to the central 40x microscope for a closer look at two wells; the arm motion is logged because it raises acceleration to about 1e-4 to 1e-3 g.

  5. day 4

    Repeat the daily run.

  6. day 5

    Termination. Twelve wells receive 4% paraformaldehyde and twelve receive RNA preservative, added directly as in the ISS heritage, with no rinse first. After about 1 h the fixed wells are washed with PBS, stained with a nucleic-acid dye and a lipid dye, and imaged on both bay fluorescence channels. The bay then cools to 4 C and holds there.

  7. day 6

    Hold at 4 C. Housekeeping data only; seal and pressure checks confirm containment before deorbit.

  8. day 7

    Deorbit, entry, splashdown and recovery. The sealed cassette stays at 4 C until handover to the customer courier on the recovery ship.

The payload module, in CAD

Every item in the module sheet, drawn and packed into the large bay deck by deck. The back face mates with the bay: blind-mate connector, and a cold wall against the bay's thermoelectric block. The front face carries Dexter-L's grapple fixture, and the fluid lines run down a channel just behind it. What you load before launch is marked blue in the configurator's payload guide.

CAD generated by cad/build_modules.py (CadQuery, OpenCascade kernel) from the catalog's module items: concept geometry, not a released design. Standard parts keep their real formats; the rest are sized from their catalog mass. The front panel and grapple fixture are left off in the 3-D view and are in the STEP.

Checks

Fits the large bayFITS313 x 191 x 365 mm envelope; 125 mm of height to spare
MassAS CATALOG6.00 kg in the parts, 6.00 kg in the catalog
Parts' boxes36 % of the 21.1 L inside
HousingTHIN0.60 kg of structure and containment: a 0.30 mm aluminium skin
Centre of mass-29 mm across and -15 mm front to back (+ is toward the front) from the middle, 100 mm up
Lines5 fluid lines and 3 harness runs, routed in the channel behind the front panel

Inside, top to bottom

  1. Experiment deck imaging stack: inverted microscope, XY stage, sample; sensor pack; dosimeter
  2. Floor deck fluid pack; 1 micro-pump, 24 valves on a manifold; controller and data storage
  • The XY stage travels 96.5 x 57.9 mm, so every one of the 24 wells reaches the objective; with the stage the imaging stack is 232 x 151 mm, which sets the module's depth budget.
  • Reagent volumes the catalog does not state are split evenly from 75 % of the reservoir item's mass.
  • Fluid pack: 4 reagent bags in 1 layer (199 x 83 x 23 mm), every port on a front edge.
  • The catalog gives 0.60 kg for structure and containment; as an aluminium box that is a 0.30 mm skin on 0.18 kg of posts and shelves. Thin: the bay rails have to carry the launch loads, or the module needs more structure mass.
  • The grapple fixture stands 26 mm proud of the front panel, into the bay opening; everything else is inside the bay envelope.
Components (6) and how each catalog item was drawn
ComponentDeckkgBox mm
fluid packFloor deck1.10199 x 91 x 22
1 micro-pump, 24 valves on a manifoldFloor deck0.80198 x 50 x 38
controller and data storageFloor deck0.1483 x 63 x 28
imaging stack: inverted microscope, XY stage, sampleExperiment deck2.60232 x 151 x 185
sensor packExperiment deck0.0744 x 61 x 28
dosimeterExperiment deck0.0754 x 32 x 14
Catalog itemkgDrawn as
24-well coupon cassette, glass-window wells, coupon carriers and lids1.25cassette
Fluid reservoirs (about 80 mL medium, 40 mL 4% paraformaldehyde, 40 mL RNA preservative, 60 mL PBS) and lines1.10bags
Pump and valve manifold with per-well addressing0.80pumps
LumaScope-class inverted microscope head, LED illumination and two-axis stage1.35microscope
Thermal interface plate and insulation for the 37 C hold0.55thermal
Triple-containment housing, seals and absorbent layer (BSL-2)0.60shell
Avionics, harness, sensors and dosimeter0.35avionics, harness, sensors, dosimeter
Every part with mass (88)
PartRolekgSize mm
medium (80 mL)fluid0.36855 x 83 x 22
medium portfluid0.0325 x 8 x 5
PBS (60 mL)fluid0.27648 x 72 x 22
PBS portfluid0.0245 x 8 x 5
4% paraformaldehyde (40 mL)fluid0.18442 x 63 x 19
4% paraformaldehyde portfluid0.0165 x 8 x 5
RNA preservative (40 mL)fluid0.18442 x 63 x 19
RNA preservative portfluid0.0165 x 8 x 5
fluid manifoldpump0.240198 x 50 x 12
micro-pump 1pump0.40020 x 20 x 26
valve 1pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 2pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 3pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 4pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 5pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 6pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 7pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 8pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 9pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 10pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 11pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 12pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 13pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 14pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 15pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 16pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 17pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 18pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 19pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 20pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 21pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 22pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 23pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
valve 24pump0.0079 x 9 x 16
controller enclosure (boards, data storage)electronics0.12683 x 55 x 28
connector 1electronics0.00712 x 8 x 12
connector 2electronics0.00712 x 8 x 12
microscope base: optics, filter cubes, cameraimaging0.698170 x 120 x 70
objectiveimaging0.04522 x 22 x 16
XY stage frame (travel 96.5 x 57.9 mm: every well over the objective)imaging0.182232 x 151 x 8
stage carriageimaging0.081140 x 98 x 5
X stepperimaging0.07128 x 20 x 20
Y stepperimaging0.07120 x 16 x 20
illumination columnimaging0.06116 x 16 x 95
illumination armimaging0.041112 x 16 x 12
LED head, transmitted lightimaging0.10128 x 28 x 22
cassette, 24 wells (SBS footprint, 19.3 mm pitch)sample1.025128 x 86 x 45
culture in the wellssample0.037112 x 73 x 8
cassette lid, sealed and gas-permeablesample0.150128 x 86 x 2
cassette fluid port 1sample0.0196 x 7 x 6
cassette fluid port 2sample0.0196 x 7 x 6
sensor packsensor0.06344 x 61 x 22
sensor pack: head 1sensor0.0048 x 8 x 6
sensor pack: head 2sensor0.0048 x 8 x 6
active silicon dosimetersensor0.04940 x 32 x 12
passive TLD holdersensor0.02112 x 12 x 14
bottom panelhousing0.048313 x 191 x 2
top panelhousing0.048313 x 191 x 2
side panel Lhousing0.0572 x 191 x 362
side panel Rhousing0.0572 x 191 x 362
back panel (bay interface)housing0.092310 x 2 x 362
front panelhousing0.092310 x 2 x 362
corner post 1housing0.0168 x 8 x 362
corner post 2housing0.0168 x 8 x 362
corner post 3housing0.0168 x 8 x 362
corner post 4housing0.0168 x 8 x 362
shelf 1housing0.117310 x 158 x 2
cold wall (to the bay's thermoelectric block)thermal0.550290 x 4 x 352
blind-mate connector: power, data, videointerface0.01350 x 10 x 22
grapple fixture base (Dexter-L)interface0.01370 x 4 x 70
harness: controller and data storage to imaging stack: inverted microscope run 1harness0.0015 x 6 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to imaging stack: inverted microscope run 2harness0.0015 x 20 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to imaging stack: inverted microscope run 3harness0.0045 x 5 x 72
harness: controller and data storage to imaging stack: inverted microscope run 4harness0.009178 x 5 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to imaging stack: inverted microscope run 5harness0.0025 x 38 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to imaging stack: inverted microscope run 6harness0.0015 x 6 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 1harness0.0015 x 6 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 2harness0.0015 x 20 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 3harness0.0025 x 5 x 32
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 4harness0.006130 x 5 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 5harness0.0085 x 171 x 5
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 6harness0.0025 x 5 x 30
harness: controller and data storage to 1 micro-pump run 7harness0.0015 x 5 x 6
harness: controller to the connector run 1harness0.0015 x 5 x 16
harness: controller to the connector run 2harness0.0065 x 116 x 5
harness: controller to the connector run 3harness0.012242 x 5 x 5
harness: controller to the connector run 4harness0.0155 x 5 x 307
harness: controller to the connector run 5harness0.0015 x 8 x 5

Measured in orbit

  • Biofilm growth over time Daily brightfield image stacks on the bay inverted microscope through each glass window. This shows the film on the window (a reference surface) and on transparent coupons; films on opaque coupons are measured after return
  • Structure at termination Two-channel fluorescence imaging after on-orbit staining of the fixed wells (nucleic-acid dye and lipid dye), optionally repeated at 40x in the central lab microscope
  • Free-floating cell density Transmission turbidity reading per well, as a rough proxy for planktonic growth
  • Culture environment Bay temperature, pressure, humidity and seal sensors logged continuously; confirms the 37 C hold and containment
  • Mechanical and radiation environment Three-axis accelerometer (quasi-steady level and arm-motion events) and active silicon dosimeter plus passive TLDs in the bay
  • Termination timing Valve and pump telemetry records when fixative or preservative reached each well; the ground control is matched to this

Measured after the return

  • Biomass, mean thickness and surface coverage Confocal laser scanning microscopy of the fixed coupons stained for nucleic acids and lipids, quantified with COMSTAT-type image analysis, as in the heritage work
  • Surface topography of film and coupon Scanning electron microscopy on fixed coupons; also shows whether the coating or texture survived the run
  • Gene expression RNA extraction and RNA-seq from the preservative-filled wells, compared with the ground control
  • Attachment pattern on textured or coated surfaces High-resolution confocal microscopy of the patterned and coated coupons to see whether cells attached in or between features
  • Material damage Surface inspection after cleaning and, if the customer asks, profilometry of coupons before and after flight
  • Viable count (optional) Plate counts from one unfixed well. The count reflects survival through two days at 4 C, not the state at day 5

Ground control

An identical flight-spare module runs at the Swiss ground segment with the same cassette, coupons, medium lot and inoculum, started about 2 h after the flight module and terminated on the same offset. The recorded flight temperature profile is played back on the ground unit. A third, non-inoculated cassette is put through the launch vibration and entry load profile to show coupons and seals survive. The bay has no on-orbit centrifuge, so the ground 1 g run is the only gravity reference; the two heritage flights disagreeing shows why that matters.

Coming home

Fixed and preserved wells come back in the sealed cassette at 4 C, the lowest the bay can hold. Fixation is on day 5 and splashdown on day 7; the cassette reaches the courier about 20 min after splashdown and the lab 1-2 days later, so about 4-5 days pass from preservation to the lab. Fixed samples tolerate this; on ISS the fixed samples were held at 4 C for weeks before return. The ISS RNA samples were kept at -80 C on orbit and returned at -20 C; LELP-1 bays cannot freeze, so RNA stays in preservative at 4 C and quality may be lower unless a passive -80 C return cassette is flown.

Limits of this flight

  • Two to fourteen days is short for this field. Spacecraft water-system biofilms build up over months, so the flight shows early attachment and growth, not mature fouling or long-term material damage.
  • No crew. Everything runs on a timer, so there is no re-dosing if a well looks wrong and no fixing a stuck valve.
  • One fixation point per well set. A time course needs several bays or relies on the daily in-flight images, which are lower resolution than post-flight confocal.
  • The bay cannot freeze. RNA stays in preservative at 4 C rather than frozen as on ISS, so transcriptomics may be weaker unless a passive cold cassette is flown.
  • No in-flight 1 g control. Without a centrifuge, the only reference is the ground run, and the heritage flights show flight-versus-ground results on this organism can go either way.
  • Static culture only. The bay has no flow loop, so it does not reproduce flowing water or condensate lines where spacecraft biofilms form.
  • In-flight imaging cannot see films on opaque coupons; those are measured only after return.
  • Entry and splashdown loads act on fixed films. Shear or sloshing can detach or smear them; the non-inoculated cassette on the ground load test is the only check.
  • 24 wells per bay gives a few replicates per material: enough for clear effects, not for small ones or dose-response work.
  • Results may be material-specific. On ISS, biofilm form depended on the material, not on gravity.
  • The column-and-canopy structure is not a safe expectation. It was reported on the shuttle flights and not seen on ISS with the same strain and an anaerobic setup but a different medium, so we do not promise it.

A satellite of its own: SP-BFM B · samples return, hardware burns up

SP-BFM is a 117 kg free-flyer. Only the samples come home: 2.4 kg ride in a 45 kg capsule in a drawer behind an optical window; the microscope looks through the window from the service module, and fluid lines cross through dry-break couplings that part at separation once the last fluid step is done. The microscope, pumps and reservoirs stay in the service module and burn up with it. Why B: biofilms are fixed, washed and stained in orbit before separation; entry loads may shear fixed films.

See SP-BFM in 3-D

Comes home · capsule

coupon cassette1.25
sample drawer, optical window, dry-break couplings0.50
drawer thermoelectric block0.60
Capsule at entry (with heat shield, parachute, hold battery, margin)45.0

Stays · service module

experiment instruments, pumps and reservoirs4.75
Service module dry, with power, radios, attitude, propulsion62.1

Budgets · estimate

Launch mass117.2 kg
Propellant for 190 m/s10.1 kg
Average / peak load59 / 113 W
Array, worst eclipse season128 W
Battery (sized by ascent)241 Wh
Deorbit burn2 × 22 N, 506 s

Tailored for this experiment

  • Glass-window wells and coupon carriers; in-flight imaging sees the window and transparent coupons, opaque coupons are read after return
  • Two termination lines per well, so morphology (paraformaldehyde) and transcriptomics (RNA preservative) come from the same run
  • A PBS line and waste volume for washing fixed wells before on-orbit staining
  • Sealed, gas-tight wells for the anaerobic case, plus a gas-permeable lid option for an aerobic bay; no gas bottle needed
  • On-orbit stain injection (nucleic-acid and lipid dyes) for the fluorescence channels

Bay or satellite?

The capsule is the floor: no capsule much smaller than about 45 kg has been recovered yet, so 2.4 kg of samples need 117 kg of satellite. On LELP-1 the same samples share one capsule, the whole lab, with 31 other bays. A dedicated satellite earns its place when the experiment needs the schedule to itself, a quieter ride (about 7.3 × 10⁻⁸ g quasi-steady, no robotic arm), or power a bay cannot give.

First-order sizing with a 20 % margin by one model for every experiment, reviewed independently; caveats and sources. The smallest recovered capsule so far (Varda W-1) is under 90 kg, so treat these masses as optimistic.

References

  1. Kim W, Tengra FK, Young Z, Shong J, Marchand N, Chan HK, Pangule RC, Parra M, Dordick JS, Plawsky JL, Collins CH (2013). Spaceflight promotes biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62437. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0062437 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062437
  2. Flores P, McBride SA, Galazka JM, Varanasi KK, Zea L (2023). Biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in spaceflight is minimized on lubricant impregnated surfaces. npj Microgravity 9: 66. doi 10.1038/s41526-023-00316-w https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/154925?show=full
  3. Flores P, Luo J, Mueller DW, Muecklich F, Zea L (2024). Space biofilms - An overview of the morphology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on silicone and cellulose membranes on board the international space station. Biofilm 7: 100182 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10869243/fullTextXML
  4. Flores P, Schauer R, McBride SA, Luo J, Hoehn C, Doraisingam S, Widhalm D, Chadha J, Selman L, Mueller DW, et al., Zea L (2022). Preparation for and performance of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm experiment on board the International Space Station. Acta Astronautica 199: 386-400. doi 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.015 https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/154935?show=full
  5. NASA Biological and Physical Sciences (accessed 2026). Space Biofilms investigation page https://science.nasa.gov/biological-physical/investigations/space-biofilms
  6. University of Colorado Boulder, Luis Zea faculty pages (accessed 2026). Space Biofilms project https://www.colorado.edu/faculty/zea-luis/space-biofilms

Fact-check: 29 claims and sources checked, 16 confirmed, 13 corrected, 0 removed · confidence high