Microbiology / infectious disease
Antibiotic resistance of pathogenic bacteria
Drug-resistant bacteria are a large cause of death on Earth: WHO estimates bacterial antimicrobial resistance was associated with more than 4.7 million deaths globally in 2021. In spaceflight the problem has a second edge, because dysregulation of the human immune system persists for the duration of a 6-month orbital flight, so an infection that is routine on the ground is harder to treat. Flight data show the bacteria change too, and they do not all change the same way: Salmonella flown on STS-115 had 167 genes differentially expressed and killed mice faster, E. coli grown on the ISS reached a 13-fold higher final cell count than its ground control with smaller cells and thicker envelopes, yet on the EcAMSat free-flyer uropathogenic E. coli came out more susceptible to gentamicin in microgravity, not less. Microgravity is worth using here because it removes sedimentation and buoyancy-driven convection, so each cell sits in a quiet, diffusion-limited layer of its own waste and of the drug, a condition that is hard to hold steady for days on the ground; the disagreement between the flight results so far is the reason to run more of these experiments, not fewer.
Who it is for
- Antibiotic developers looking for stress-response targets (sigma-s / rpoS, Hfq) that change drug tolerance without genetic selection
- Space agency crew health offices needing dosing evidence for long missions
- Academic microbiology and infectious disease labs with modeled-microgravity results that need a real flight test
- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and diagnostics companies checking how their assays behave under low shear
- Biofilm and medical device companies studying aggregate formation and matrix production
- National AMR research programmes funding mechanism work on tolerance and persistence
What earlier flights found
| Year | Mission | What flew | What it found |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 (September) | STS-115 (Space Shuttle Atlantis)Space Shuttle middeck, crew-activated hardware | Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain chi-3339 in fluid processing apparatus (FPA) units, activated and fixed in flight, with matched ground controls | 167 genes were differentially expressed in flight versus ground controls (69 up, 98 down) and 73 proteins changed level. The RNA-binding protein Hfq came out as a likely global regulator: expression of 64 genes in the Hfq regulon was altered in flight, 32 percent of the genes identified. Mice infected with the flight bacteria showed decreased time to death, increased mortality across doses and a reduced LD50. Flight samples showed cellular aggregation and clumping associated with the formation of an extracellular matrix.1 |
| 2017 (paper; the flight year is not stated on the pages we opened) | E. coli gentamicin culture experiment on the ISS (Zea et al.)ISS, BioServe fluid processing apparatus in a group activation pack inside the CGBA incubator | E. coli ATCC 4157 (non-motile) in Medium E minimal medium with 5 g/L glucose at 30 C, challenged with gentamicin at seven levels from 25 to 175 micrograms/mL in 25 micrograms/mL steps, 49 h total incubation | A 13-fold increase in final cell count in space with respect to Earth. Space-grown cells were 37 percent of the volume of their matched Earth controls. Cell envelope thickness increased by 25 percent at 25 micrograms/mL and 43 percent at 50 micrograms/mL gentamicin. Outer membrane vesicles were observed on the spaceflight samples but not on the Earth cultures. Note the strain is a laboratory E. coli, not a uropathogen, and the run was at 30 C, not body temperature.2 |
| 2017 (launch and deployment); results published 2020 | EcAMSat (E. coli AntiMicrobial Satellite), NASA Ames and Stanford6U free-flying small satellite, 11 kg (a press report at launch gave about 10 kg), carried to the ISS in November 2017 on an Orbital ATK Antares/Cygnus cargo flight and then ejected from the station's Japanese robotic arm into low Earth orbit | Wild-type uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and its isogenic delta-rpoS mutant, which lacks the sigma factor sigma-s. Both strains were grown to stationary phase in a 48-microwell fluidic card, starved for over 24 h, then dosed with three concentrations of gentamicin. alamarBlue, a redox indicator, was administered and metabolic activity was measured optically using the payload's LED and detector system over a 144 h incubation, with a parallel ground-based control experiment. | sigma-s is known to increase antibiotic resistance in Earth gravity; EcAMSat tested whether that holds in microgravity. Published result: microgravity did not enhance UPEC resistance to gentamicin - in fact both strains were more susceptible to gentamicin in microgravity. Growth rates of the two strains were unaltered by microgravity, both strains metabolised more slowly in microgravity, and the delta-rpoS mutant was 34 to 37 percent less metabolically active than the wild type across four condition sets (ground with and without gentamicin, microgravity with and without gentamicin). The authors also report that multi-week storage in the payload hardware stressed the cells and may have obscured small differences. Two heritage points for LELP-1: an automated grow-starve-dose-read chain works on an uncrewed free-flyer, and time between loading and dosing has to be kept short.3458 |
How LELP-1 runs it
Sample. Uropathogenic E. coli, BSL-2 clinical isolate, flown as a matched pair: wild type and an isogenic deletion mutant of the stress-response sigma factor gene rpoS. 4 gentamicin levels (0, 25, 55, 100 micrograms/mL) x 2 strains x 3 wells = 24 wells. Container. One 24-well sealed microfluidic cassette in a large bay, about 400 microlitres per well, each well with its own inlet, outlet and LED/photodiode pair. BSL-2 triple containment with an absorbent secondary tray and a seal pressure sensor. Launch. Live cells, no cryopreservation: loaded at the launch site within 24 h of liftoff and held dormant at 4 C in the sealed wells, with growth medium kept in a separate reservoir and not in contact with the cells. No thaw step and no -80 C cassette. Load-to-dose time is kept to days, because EcAMSat reported that multi-week storage in payload hardware stressed the cells. Light and gas. No light needed for growth; the only light is the 570 nm and 600 nm LED pairs used for the dye readout, plus the microscope illuminator. No CO2 supply needed: the medium is HEPES-buffered and the sealed air headspace is sized for the well volume. Headspace oxygen is monitored, not replenished.
- day 0
Launch. Bay held at 4 C, cells dormant, seal and pressure logged every minute. Dosimeter running.
- day 1
Orbit reached and the lab is quiet. Bay ramps to 37 C over 1 h. Pump fills all 24 wells with HEPES-buffered growth medium. Optical density read every 15 min.
- day 2
Cultures reach stationary phase (expected 18 to 24 h), then are held without fresh medium so they starve, as EcAMSat did for over 24 h before dosing. Microscope takes a brightfield image of every well to check for aggregates before dosing.
- day 3
Dosing. Gentamicin injected at 0, 25, 55 and 100 micrograms/mL, three wells per strain per level, then alamarBlue redox dye into all 24 wells. Optical readout at 570 and 600 nm every 30 min starts here and runs 72 h. Live/dead fluorescence images every 6 h.
- day 4
Dose-response window continues. Downlink the optical series once per orbit so the team can confirm the assay is working while there is still time to extend the window.
- day 5
Robotic arm carries the bay to the central lab for one 40x fluorescence look at the highest-dose wells (aggregates, matrix, vesicle-scale structures). Arm motion window logged, since quasi-steady microgravity is lost to 1e-4 to 1e-3 g while it moves.
- day 6
End of exposure. 12 wells get RNA stabiliser (transcriptome snapshot taken in orbit), 6 wells get glutaraldehyde fixative for electron microscopy, 6 wells are left live for ground plating. Bay drops to 4 C and holds. Waste line chemically inactivated.
- day 7
Deorbit, re-entry under the inflatable heat shield, splashdown. Bay stays at 4 C through recovery; samples handed to the customer courier on the recovery ship about 20 min after splashdown.
The payload module, in CAD
Every item in the module sheet, drawn and packed into the large bay deck by deck. The back face mates with the bay: blind-mate connector, and a cold wall against the bay's thermoelectric block. The front face carries Dexter-L's grapple fixture, and the fluid lines run down a channel just behind it. What you load before launch is marked blue in the configurator's payload guide.
CAD generated by cad/build_modules.py (CadQuery, OpenCascade kernel) from the catalog's module items: concept geometry, not a released design. Standard parts keep their real formats; the rest are sized from their catalog mass. The front panel and grapple fixture are left off in the 3-D view and are in the STEP.
Checks
| Fits the large bay | FITS | 313 x 191 x 365 mm envelope; 205 mm of height to spare |
| Mass | AS CATALOG | 5.80 kg in the parts, 5.80 kg in the catalog |
| Parts' boxes | 15 % of the 21.1 L inside | |
| Housing | THIN | 0.64 kg of structure and containment: a 0.32 mm aluminium skin |
| Centre of mass | +5 mm across and -14 mm front to back (+ is toward the front) from the middle, 97 mm up | |
| Lines | 10 fluid lines and 3 harness runs, routed in the channel behind the front panel |
Inside, top to bottom
- Experiment deck cassette in the optical readout; sensor pack; dosimeter; peristaltic pump, 12-port rotary valve on a manifold
- Floor deck controller and data storage; fluid pack
- Each well sits between its own LED and photodiode, as in EcAMSat's optical card: no microscope, no moving parts.
- Reagent volumes the catalog does not state are split evenly from 75 % of the reservoir item's mass. The waste bag holds the spent medium and washes; fixatives and stabilisers stay in the wells and come home.
- Fluid pack: 8 reagent bags in 4 layers (118 x 113 x 69 mm), every port on a front edge.
- The waste bag lies under the reagent bags and fills the room they free: they hold 275 mL, it needs 170 mL.
- The catalog gives 0.64 kg for structure and containment; as an aluminium box that is a 0.32 mm skin on 0.19 kg of posts and shelves. Thin: the bay rails have to carry the launch loads, or the module needs more structure mass.
- The grapple fixture stands 26 mm proud of the front panel, into the bay opening; everything else is inside the bay envelope.
Components (6) and how each catalog item was drawn
| Component | Deck | kg | Box mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| controller and data storage | Floor deck | 0.44 | 146 x 106 x 28 |
| fluid pack | Floor deck | 1.40 | 124 x 121 x 78 |
| cassette in the optical readout | Experiment deck | 1.40 | 148 x 106 x 58 |
| sensor pack | Experiment deck | 0.11 | 77 x 55 x 28 |
| dosimeter | Experiment deck | 0.20 | 54 x 32 x 14 |
| peristaltic pump, 12-port rotary valve on a manifold | Experiment deck | 0.80 | 132 x 60 x 40 |
| Catalog item | kg | Drawn as |
|---|---|---|
| 24-well sealed microfluidic cassette, filled with cells and medium | 1.15 | cassette |
| Reagent reservoirs: medium 150 mL, 3 gentamicin stocks 10 mL each, alamarBlue 25 mL, RNA stabiliser 30 mL, glutaraldehyde 20 mL, lysis buffer 20 mL | 0.95 | bags |
| Peristaltic pump and 12-port valve manifold | 0.80 | pumps |
| Triple-containment shell, seals, pressure and humidity sensors | 0.75 | shell, sensors |
| 25 W thermoelectric block and heat spreader | 0.70 | thermal |
| Bay controller avionics and harness | 0.55 | avionics, harness |
| Waste bag with chemical inactivation and absorbent secondary tray | 0.45 | waste |
| Optical readout board: 24 LED/photodiode pairs at 570 and 600 nm | 0.25 | readout |
| Active silicon dosimeter and passive TLD holder | 0.20 | dosimeter |
Every part with mass (81)
| Part | Role | kg | Size mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| controller enclosure (boards, data storage) | electronics | 0.396 | 146 x 98 x 28 |
| connector 1 | electronics | 0.022 | 12 x 8 x 12 |
| connector 2 | electronics | 0.022 | 12 x 8 x 12 |
| medium (150 mL) | fluid | 0.477 | 75 x 113 x 22 |
| medium port | fluid | 0.042 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| RNA stabiliser (30 mL) | fluid | 0.095 | 38 x 57 x 17 |
| RNA stabiliser port | fluid | 0.008 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| alamarBlue (25 mL) | fluid | 0.080 | 36 x 54 x 16 |
| alamarBlue port | fluid | 0.007 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| glutaraldehyde (20 mL) | fluid | 0.064 | 33 x 50 x 15 |
| glutaraldehyde port | fluid | 0.005 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| lysis buffer (20 mL) | fluid | 0.064 | 33 x 50 x 15 |
| lysis buffer port | fluid | 0.005 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| gentamicin 1 (10 mL) | fluid | 0.032 | 26 x 40 x 12 |
| gentamicin 1 port | fluid | 0.003 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| gentamicin 2 (10 mL) | fluid | 0.032 | 26 x 40 x 12 |
| gentamicin 2 port | fluid | 0.003 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| gentamicin 3 (10 mL) | fluid | 0.032 | 26 x 40 x 12 |
| gentamicin 3 port | fluid | 0.003 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| waste bag (empty at launch, 170 mL capacity), under the reagent bags | fluid | 0.243 | 118 x 113 x 5 |
| waste bag port | fluid | 0.027 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
| absorbent secondary tray | fluid | 0.180 | 124 x 119 x 10 |
| photodiode board, 24 photodiodes | imaging | 0.105 | 148 x 106 x 2 |
| photodiodes | imaging | 0.007 | 100 x 62 x 2 |
| LED board, 24 LEDs at 570 and 600 nm | imaging | 0.105 | 148 x 106 x 2 |
| LEDs | imaging | 0.007 | 100 x 62 x 2 |
| board spacer 1 | imaging | 0.006 | 6 x 6 x 57 |
| board spacer 2 | imaging | 0.006 | 6 x 6 x 57 |
| board spacer 3 | imaging | 0.006 | 6 x 6 x 57 |
| board spacer 4 | imaging | 0.006 | 6 x 6 x 57 |
| cassette, 24 wells (SBS footprint, 19.3 mm pitch) | sample | 0.943 | 128 x 86 x 45 |
| culture in the wells | sample | 0.035 | 112 x 73 x 8 |
| cassette lid, sealed and gas-permeable | sample | 0.138 | 128 x 86 x 2 |
| cassette fluid port 1 | sample | 0.017 | 6 x 7 x 6 |
| cassette fluid port 2 | sample | 0.017 | 6 x 7 x 6 |
| sensor pack | sensor | 0.101 | 77 x 55 x 22 |
| sensor pack: head 1 | sensor | 0.006 | 8 x 8 x 6 |
| sensor pack: head 2 | sensor | 0.006 | 8 x 8 x 6 |
| active silicon dosimeter | sensor | 0.140 | 40 x 32 x 12 |
| passive TLD holder | sensor | 0.060 | 12 x 12 x 14 |
| fluid manifold | pump | 0.240 | 132 x 50 x 12 |
| 12-port rotary valve | pump | 0.120 | 40 x 40 x 20 |
| peristaltic pump housing | pump | 0.320 | 60 x 45 x 40 |
| peristaltic roller head | pump | 0.120 | 36 x 12 x 36 |
| bottom panel | housing | 0.051 | 313 x 191 x 2 |
| top panel | housing | 0.051 | 313 x 191 x 2 |
| side panel L | housing | 0.060 | 2 x 191 x 362 |
| side panel R | housing | 0.060 | 2 x 191 x 362 |
| back panel (bay interface) | housing | 0.098 | 310 x 2 x 362 |
| front panel | housing | 0.098 | 310 x 2 x 362 |
| corner post 1 | housing | 0.017 | 8 x 8 x 362 |
| corner post 2 | housing | 0.017 | 8 x 8 x 362 |
| corner post 3 | housing | 0.017 | 8 x 8 x 362 |
| corner post 4 | housing | 0.017 | 8 x 8 x 362 |
| shelf 1 | housing | 0.124 | 310 x 158 x 2 |
| cold wall (to the bay's thermoelectric block) | thermal | 0.420 | 290 x 4 x 352 |
| thermoelectric tile 1 | thermal | 0.044 | 30 x 3 x 30 |
| thermoelectric tile 2 | thermal | 0.044 | 30 x 3 x 30 |
| thermoelectric tile 3 | thermal | 0.044 | 30 x 3 x 30 |
| thermoelectric tile 4 | thermal | 0.044 | 30 x 3 x 30 |
| heat spreader | thermal | 0.105 | 160 x 3 x 100 |
| blind-mate connector: power, data, video | interface | 0.013 | 50 x 10 x 22 |
| grapple fixture base (Dexter-L) | interface | 0.013 | 70 x 4 x 70 |
| harness: controller and data storage to cassette in the optical readout run 1 | harness | 0.001 | 5 x 6 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to cassette in the optical readout run 2 | harness | 0.002 | 5 x 20 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to cassette in the optical readout run 3 | harness | 0.007 | 5 x 5 x 84 |
| harness: controller and data storage to cassette in the optical readout run 4 | harness | 0.001 | 15 x 5 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to cassette in the optical readout run 5 | harness | 0.006 | 5 x 68 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to cassette in the optical readout run 6 | harness | 0.001 | 5 x 6 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 1 | harness | 0.001 | 5 x 6 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 2 | harness | 0.002 | 5 x 20 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 3 | harness | 0.012 | 5 x 5 x 145 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 4 | harness | 0.017 | 203 x 5 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 5 | harness | 0.009 | 5 x 111 x 5 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 6 | harness | 0.005 | 5 x 5 x 56 |
| harness: controller and data storage to peristaltic pump run 7 | harness | 0.001 | 5 x 5 x 6 |
| harness: controller to the connector run 1 | harness | 0.005 | 5 x 5 x 56 |
| harness: controller to the connector run 2 | harness | 0.008 | 5 x 96 x 5 |
| harness: controller to the connector run 3 | harness | 0.009 | 101 x 5 x 5 |
| harness: controller to the connector run 4 | harness | 0.023 | 5 x 5 x 266 |
| harness: controller to the connector run 5 | harness | 0.001 | 5 x 8 x 5 |
Measured in orbit
- Metabolic activity / dose response alamarBlue redox dye reduction, read as 570 nm vs 600 nm absorbance by the per-well LED and photodiode pair every 30 min for 72 h. Same readout class EcAMSat flew, where metabolic activity was measured optically using the payload's LED and detector system.
- Growth curve to stationary phase Optical density on the same LED/photodiode pair every 15 min from medium fill to dosing.
- Live/dead fraction Bay microscope, two fluorescence channels, SYTO 9 and propidium iodide, imaged every 6 h after dosing.
- Aggregation and matrix formation Brightfield images of every well before dosing and every 6 h after; one 40x fluorescence session in the central lab on day 5.
- Environment and containment Bay temperature, pressure, humidity and seal sensors at 1 min cadence; accelerometer for the arm-motion windows.
- Radiation dose Active silicon dosimeter logged through the flight, passive TLDs read after return.
Measured after the return
- Viable counts CFU plating of the 6 live wells on arrival at the customer lab, plated against the ground control run.
- MIC and MBC confirmation Standard broth microdilution on returned isolates, so the flight dye signal is anchored to a clinical susceptibility number.
- Transcriptome RNA-seq on the 12 wells stabilised in orbit on day 6, compared with the ground control; targeted at the sigma-s (rpoS) and Hfq regulons.
- Proteome LC-MS/MS on the stabilised lysates.
- Cell envelope and ultrastructure Transmission electron microscopy on the glutaraldehyde-fixed wells, measuring envelope thickness, cell volume and outer membrane vesicles, as in the ISS E. coli work.
- Genome check Whole-genome sequencing of returned isolates to show the change was not a selected mutation.
- Virulence (optional, customer facility) Murine infection model on returned live cells, as done for the STS-115 Salmonella. Needs the customer's animal facility and ethics approval; not part of the standard service.
Ground control
An identical cassette in an identical bay inside the flight-spare satellite on the ground, run on a 24 h delayed timeline that replays the actual flight telemetry: measured bay temperature, pressure, humidity and the real fluidics command log, same cell lot, same cassette fill batch, same reagent lots. EcAMSat ran a parallel ground-based control experiment against its flight data, and a second ground-control experiment that showed multi-week storage in the payload hardware stressed the cells - so our ground arm also carries a storage-matched control, and the flight plan keeps load-to-dose time short. Because launch loads, re-entry loads and the 550 km radiation dose are not reproduced on the ground, we also fly a 1 g reference: three wells of each strain in a bay on the onboard centrifuge, so microgravity can be separated from the rest of the flight environment. Without that 1 g arm, any flight-versus-ground difference stays confounded.
Coming home
Fixed and RNA-stabilised wells are robust: 4 C and up to 48 h from day-6 preservation to the lab is fine. The live wells are the tight ones - plate them within 24 h of splashdown, because cells sitting at 4 C in spent medium keep changing expression and losing viability. That is why the transcriptome and electron microscopy samples are preserved in orbit on day 6 rather than on the ship: the only clean snapshot of the flight state is one taken in flight.
Limits of this flight
- The flight evidence does not point one way. ISS E. coli grew to a 13-fold higher final cell count in space, while EcAMSat found uropathogenic E. coli more susceptible to gentamicin in microgravity and its growth rate unchanged. One 7-day flight will not settle that; it adds one well-controlled point.
- A 2 to 14 day flight gives one dose-response, not evolution. Resistance that arises by selection over weeks of serial passage cannot be studied here.
- EcAMSat incubated its cells with the dye for 144 h after dosing. Our 7-day baseline gives a 72 h window; matching EcAMSat's readout length needs a 10-day mission, which is inside the 2 to 14 day envelope but costs more.
- No crew. There is no plating, no colony picking, no re-dosing decision in the moment and no fixing a stuck valve. Every move must be in the fluidic plan before launch, and a single pump or valve failure can cost the whole bay.
- 24 wells means 3 replicates per condition. That resolves a large shift in tolerance, not a small one. EcAMSat's own report notes that cell stress in the hardware could obscure small differential effects, so customers wanting statistical power should buy more than one bay.
- The in-flight readout is dye reduction, that is metabolic activity, not colony-forming units. A clinical MIC number must be confirmed on the ground, and returned live cells spend 1 to 2 days at 4 C before plating.
- Only wells preserved in orbit give a clean flight-state transcriptome or ultrastructure. Anything judged after the courier hand-off has a day or two of cold storage written into it.
- Launch loads, re-entry loads and the 550 km radiation dose are confounders. Only the onboard 1 g control separates microgravity from them, and that control shares the same radiation and vibration history, not the same gravity history as a laboratory on Earth.
- Quasi-steady microgravity is about 1e-6 g near the centre of mass, but rises to 1e-4 to 1e-3 g while the robotic arm moves. Data taken in those windows is not a clean microgravity measurement and is flagged as such.
- No animal virulence test on board. The STS-115 result that flight Salmonella killed mice faster needed returned live cells and a ground animal facility; LELP-1 can return the cells, nothing more.
- No host. There is no infection model, no human pharmacokinetics and no immune system in the bay, so nothing here translates directly into a dosing recommendation for a crew member.
- No CO2 supply. Fine for E. coli, but a bacteria-plus-host-cell co-culture would need HEPES-buffered media and gas-permeable lids and is a harder sell in a sealed bay.
- LELP-1 is a design in a digital twin. No bay, cassette or thermoelectric block described here has flown, and every mass, power and timing number above is our estimate awaiting test.
A satellite of its own: SP-AMR B · samples return, hardware burns up
SP-AMR is a 117 kg free-flyer. Only the samples come home: 2.2 kg ride in a 45 kg capsule in a drawer behind an optical window; the microscope looks through the window from the service module, and fluid lines cross through dry-break couplings that part at separation once the last fluid step is done. The microscope, pumps and reservoirs stay in the service module and burn up with it. Why B: the in-flight metabolic readout flies alone on an EcAMSat-class CubeSat (option A), but plating, MIC, RNA-seq, proteome, TEM and genome checks need the cassette back.
Comes home · capsule
| 24-well microfluidic cassette (stabilised, fixed and 6 live wells) | 1.15 |
| sample drawer, optical window, dry-break couplings | 0.50 |
| drawer thermoelectric block | 0.60 |
| Capsule at entry (with heat shield, parachute, hold battery, margin) | 45.0 |
Stays · service module
| experiment instruments, pumps and reservoirs | 4.65 |
| Service module dry, with power, radios, attitude, propulsion | 61.9 |
Budgets · estimate
| Launch mass | 117.0 kg |
| Propellant for 190 m/s | 10.1 kg |
| Average / peak load | 59 / 113 W |
| Array, worst eclipse season | 128 W |
| Battery (sized by ascent) | 241 Wh |
| Deorbit burn | 2 × 22 N, 505 s |
Tailored for this experiment
- Per-well absorbance photometry: 570 nm and 600 nm LED plus photodiode pairs on all 24 wells. The standard bay gives a microscope, not a plate reader, and the redox dye assay is the primary in-flight measurement.
- Live/dead fluorescence filter set (SYTO 9 and propidium iodide) on the bay microscope.
- A 1 g reference position on the onboard centrifuge for 3 wells of each strain, with the same thermal and fluidic service as the microgravity bay.
- Extra reservoirs and lines for RNA stabiliser and glutaraldehyde, and the ability to drop the bay from 37 C to 4 C and hold it there from day 6 through recovery.
- Bio-waste bag with chemical inactivation before splashdown, plus a verified seal log for a pathogenic strain under BSL-2 triple containment.
Bay or satellite?
The capsule is the floor: no capsule much smaller than about 45 kg has been recovered yet, so 2.2 kg of samples need 117 kg of satellite. On LELP-1 the same samples share one capsule, the whole lab, with 31 other bays. A dedicated satellite earns its place when the experiment needs the schedule to itself, a quieter ride (about 7.3 × 10⁻⁸ g quasi-steady, no robotic arm), or power a bay cannot give.
Option A, no return. The in-flight readout alone can fly on a CubeSat with no capsule: EcAMSat, NASA Ames' 6U biological CubeSat (10.7 kg), flew this assay in 2017; a 6U may weigh up to 12 kg. It keeps the in-orbit science and loses every post-flight assay.
First-order sizing with a 20 % margin by one model for every experiment, reviewed independently; caveats and sources. The smallest recovered capsule so far (Varda W-1) is under 90 kg, so treat these masses as optimistic.
References
- Wilson JW, Ott CM, Honer zu Bentrup K, et al., 2007, Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(41):16299-16304, doi:10.1073/pnas.0707155104 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2042201
- Zea L, Larsen M, Estante F, Qvortrup K, Moeller R, Dias de Oliveira S, Stodieck L, Klaus D, 2017, Phenotypic Changes Exhibited by E. coli Cultured in Space, Frontiers in Microbiology 8:1598 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01598/full
- NASA Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute, E. coli AntiMicrobial Satellite (EcAMSat): Results and Lessons Learned from NASA's first 6U Biological CubeSat (Community of Practice webinar page) https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/community-of-practice/e-coli-antimicrobial-satellite-ecamsat-results-and-lessons-learned-from-nasas-first-6u-biological-cubesat
- Padgen MR, Lera MP, Parra MP, Ricco AJ, Chin M, Chinn TN, Cohen A, Friedericks CR, Henschke MB, Snyder TV, Spremo SM, Wang JH, Matin AC, 2020, EcAMSat spaceflight measurements of the role of sigma-s in antibiotic resistance of stationary phase Escherichia coli in microgravity, Life Sciences in Space Research 24:18-24, doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2019.10.007, PMID 31987476 (record and abstract served by Europe PMC; the Elsevier full text is paywalled) https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:31987476&resultType=core&format=json
- Spaceflight Now, 14 November 2017, Cygnus arrives at space station with food, experiments and cache of CubeSats https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/11/14/cygnus-arrives-at-space-station-with-food-experiments-and-cache-of-cubesats/
- Crucian BE, Choukèr A, Simpson RJ, et al., 2018, Immune System Dysregulation During Spaceflight: Potential Countermeasures for Deep Space Exploration Missions, Frontiers in Immunology 9:1437 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01437/full
- World Health Organization, Antimicrobial resistance fact sheet (accessed 4 October 2026) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance
- Matin AC, Wang J-H, Keyhan M, Singh R, Benoit M, Parra MP, Padgen MR, Ricco AJ, et al., preprint, Payload Hardware and Experimental Protocol for Testing the Effect of Space Microgravity on the Resistance to Gentamicin of Stationary-Phase Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Its Sigma-S-Deficient Mutant, NASA Technical Reports Server record 20190001420 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190001420
Fact-check: 19 claims and sources checked, 11 confirmed, 7 corrected, 1 removed · confidence high